Bienvenue chez Tous Services Côte d'Ivoire
Tous services Côte d'IvoireTous services Côte d'IvoireTous services Côte d'Ivoire
27 21 28 67 22 / 01 71 97 54 51
Koumassi Remblais.

The measurement model was examined utilizing LISREL (8

The measurement model was examined utilizing LISREL (8

7) and was evaluated based on multiple goodness of fit indices, with the maximum likelihood as the estimation method. Examination of the results revealed that the fit of the model was a fairly good fit although not necessarily a superior fit for the data, ? 2 (323, N = 914), = , p < .001, SRMR = .066, RMSEA = .08, NFI = .91, and CFI = .93, suggesting overall a good fit. The final standardized solution factor loadings were all significant (p < .05) and ranged from .40 to .81 for the constructivist techniques and from .47 to .71 for the cognitive behavioral techniques. The correlation between the two factors was –.30. p < .03. See Table 1 for alphas in the current study

Correlational Analyses

Person Product Moment correlations, using a criterion level of .05 (1-tailed), were computed between the two epistemology subscales (Rationalist and Constructivist) and each of the criterion variables in an attempt to confirm that the relationships were in the predicted directions. Results were in the predicted directions, revealing a significant positive correlation between the TAQ-SF constructivist subscale and the CAS, r = 0.30, P ? 0.001 and a significant negative correlation between the TAQ-SF rationalist subscale and the CAS, r = – 0.36, P ? .001. Additionally, a Pearson Product Moment correlation was conducted on the TAQ-SF rationalist and constructivist subscales to justify their use as two separate continuous subscale scores, r = –.09, p < .001.

To have counselor style, this new rationalist and constructivist subscales have been significantly correlated on subscales of one’s PST-Q, all-in the newest predict recommendations. Into WAI-S, rationalist epistemologies were not notably coordinated which have the WAI-S subscales (e.grams. Activity, Bond, and you will Objective); but not, the fresh app incontri over 60 new constructivist epistemology try notably undoubtedly coordinated with all around three subscales of your WAI-S and in the brand new predict recommendations. When examining type of process practitioners use in cures, the latest rationalist epistemology is actually notably negatively synchronised by using constructivist procedure (roentgen = – .thirty two, P ? .001) and you can somewhat surely correlated through the use of cognitive behavioral procedure (r = 0.43, P ? .001), that was about predict recommendations. If you’re, constructivist epistemologies were notably undoubtedly coordinated by using constructivist processes (r = 0.22, P ? .001), that was from the predict guidelines; but not, constructivist epistemology was not rather coordinated which have cognitive behavioural process. (Come across Dining table 2 to possess an entire set of correlations).

Regression Analyses

So you can assess the strength of the research become based on the normality assumptions away from several regressions, the information and knowledge is actually confronted with assessment off skewness and you will kurtosis. Outcome of such analyses mean that the brand new assumptions having multivariate normalcy had been met. At exactly the same time, Bonferroni variations were utilized.

Hypothesis step one-Therapist Epistemology because the a beneficial Predictor off Cures Build

The first hypothesis alarmed therapist epistemology because the good predictor regarding therapy concept. I hypothesized you to therapists having rational epistemologies would have a relief style depicting a lot more tightness into the Academic subscale, deeper point on the Expressive subscale, a lowered amount of Wedding, a beneficial narrower focus on the Attentional subscale, and be way more organized on Surgical subscale compared to therapists having a good constructivist epistemology. Independent regression analyses have been used for each of your four PST-Q ratings computing procedures layout.

The Instructional Subscale The epistemology scores accounted for significant variation in Instructional scores, F(2, 1061) = 7.06, p < .001 (R 2 = .013). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = .053) was in the positive direction, but was not significant- t(1061) = 1.73, p < .084. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = – 0.097) was significant and in the negative direction for the Instructional subscale- t(1061) = –3.15, p < .002. The direction of the effect indicated that the more a therapist endorsed constructivist epistemology, the less likely that therapist was to use an instructional approach to therapy. This supported the hypothesis that a constructivist epistemology tends toward the direction of flexibility on the Instructional subscale; however, the small effect size of approximately 1% of the variance needs to be considered.

Leave A Comment